Before reading the post, I invite you to watch the video IS OBTAINING SEXUAL VIDEOS FROM MINORS SEXUAL ASSAULT?, https://youtu.be/8-C4RrKGE-Y
SHOULD IT BE DIFFERENTIATED IF THE CRIME IS COMMITTED WITH VIOLENCE OR CYBERVIOLENCE?
“The differential elements between cyberviolence or cyberintimidation with respect to violence or intimidation exerted on the victim in an offensive scenario of continuity or physical proximity, are not enough to generate different normative categories of intimidation that prevent the subsumption of such behaviors in the types of sexual assault.
The digital setting does not alter the essential elements of typical behavior. Moreover, the social dimension of TIC, by facilitating the exchange of images and videos of acts of sexual objectification, can become a very powerful instrument of intimidation with a greater harmful and lasting impact of damage to the legal right. It should not be lost sight of the fact that TICs have increased the modes of accessibility to children by people who seek, as their sole objective, their sexual abuse and exploitation.”
SHOULD BULLYING BE REPEATED IN EVERY SEXUAL ACT?
No. “The announcement of a serious evil supported by express or symbolic behaviors that transmit to the recipient a structural fear, a fear of choosing any other alternative, does not claim that in each sexual act the perpetrator must repeat the intimidating formula.”
Copyright ABOGADA NATHALIE GONZALEZ Y MEDIADORA, Creator of OBJETIVO CERO VÍCTIMAS.
Sin comentarios
